Law MonitorLaw MonitorLaw Monitor
  • Home
  • News
  • LAW Notes
    • CLAT / CUET
    • Hindu Law
    • Muslim law
    • Administrative Law Notes: JUDICIARY NOTES
    • ICA 1872
    • evidence act 2023
  • BA LLB NOTES
    • Political Science
    • Ballb/LLB Sample Paper-DBRAU
    • History
  • Legal Maxims
  • My Laws
  • Bare Acts Download
  • Blog
  • Hindi Posts
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Law MonitorLaw Monitor
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • History
  • Bookmarks
  • News
  • My Laws
  • CLAT / CUET
  • Legal Maxims
  • Blog
  • Home
  • News
  • LAW Notes
    • CLAT / CUET
    • Hindu Law
    • Muslim law
    • Administrative Law Notes: JUDICIARY NOTES
    • ICA 1872
    • evidence act 2023
  • BA LLB NOTES
    • Political Science
    • Ballb/LLB Sample Paper-DBRAU
    • History
  • Legal Maxims
  • My Laws
  • Bare Acts Download
  • Blog
  • Hindi Posts
Follow US
Law Monitor > Blog > Administrative Law > Rule Against Bias – Short Notes Lawmonitor
Administrative Law

Rule Against Bias – Short Notes Lawmonitor

Last updated: 31/08/2024 9:19 am
By Admin 381 Views
Share
7 Min Read
Rule Against Bias - Short Notes Lawmonitor
Rule Against Bias - Defination and Types
SHARE

The Rule Against Bias is a core principle of natural justice, ensuring that decision-makers are impartial and act without prejudice. Bias involves any preconceived opinions or predispositions that could affect one’s judgment, leading to decisions based on factors beyond the presented evidence. This rule seeks to prevent improper influences from affecting a judge’s decision, acknowledging that human nature often favors one’s own interests. The ultimate goal is to build public trust in the fairness of administrative decisions.

Contents
What is Rule Against BiasTypes of Bias:Personal Bias:Pecuniary Bias:Subject Matter Bias:Policy Notion Bias:Pre-Conceived Notion Bias:Bias on Account of Obstinacy:Importance of the Rule Against Bias:Case Studies Highlighting the Rule Against Bias:Download PDF NotesClick Here To Download Rules Against Bias- PDF

As highlighted by Lord Hewart CJ in R v. Sussex, justice must not only be served but also be perceived as being done. A decision compromised by bias is deemed invalid, rendering the trial “Coram non judice” (before a judge lacking proper authority)

Read Full Administrative Law NotesClick Here

What is Rule Against Bias

The Rule Against Bias ensures that decision-makers and judges must remain impartial, free from personal, financial, or preconceived opinions that could influence their judgment. It is a cornerstone of natural justice, ensuring fair and unbiased proceedings.

Principle:

Nemo in propria causa judex: This principle, meaning “no one should be a judge in their own case,” is the foundation of the rule against bias. It prevents any conflict of interest that could lead to an unfair judgment.

Types of Bias:

Personal Bias:

Arises from a personal relationship between the decision-maker and one of the parties involved, potentially leading to favoritism.

  • Example: In Ramanand Prasad Singh vs. UOI, a panel member related to a candidate was asked to recuse themselves to maintain impartiality.

Pecuniary Bias:

Occurs when a decision-maker stands to gain financially from the outcome, no matter how small the benefit.

Read Also

Principles of Natural Justice and the Constitution of India – Lawmonitor Notes
Judicial Control of Administrative Discretion- Delegation of Discretion
  • Example: In J. Mohapatra & Co. v. State of Orissa, a committee member was also an author of the books being considered, leading to invalidation of the decision due to potential financial gain.

Subject Matter Bias:

Happens when the decision-maker has a direct or indirect interest in the subject matter of the case.

  • Example: In Gullapalli Nageswara Rao v. A.P.S.R.T.C., the Secretary involved in a transport hearing had a conflict of interest, leading to the decision being quashed.

Policy Notion Bias:

Refers to bias from preconceived notions or policy decisions made by the decision-maker.

- Advertisement -
  • Example: In T. Govindaraja Mudaliar v. State of T.N., the Supreme Court found no bias in a Home Secretary’s hearing, despite prior involvement in forming the policy under scrutiny.

Pre-Conceived Notion Bias:

Occurs when the decision-maker holds pre-existing opinions about the case, affecting impartiality.

  • Example: In Kondala Rao v. APSRTC, the court rejected claims of bias, emphasizing that prior policy decisions did not necessarily indicate bias.

Bias on Account of Obstinacy:

Arises when a decision-maker stubbornly upholds their decision despite valid reasons for reconsideration.

  • Example: In A.U. Kureshi v. High Court of Gujarat, a judge’s involvement in both the disciplinary committee and the subsequent appeal was deemed improper, leading to the Supreme Court overturning the decision.

Importance of the Rule Against Bias:

This rule is critical to upholding justice and fairness in judicial and administrative processes. Violations can result in the invalidation of decisions and processes, as they would be considered unfair and unlawful.

- Advertisement -

Case Studies Highlighting the Rule Against Bias:

  • Personal Bias: Mineral Development Corporation Ltd. v. State of Bihar and G.N. Nayak v. Goa University demonstrated how personal relationships or professional connections could raise reasonable suspicion of bias.
  • Pecuniary Bias: The J. Mohapatra & Co. case underscored how financial interests, even indirect ones, could invalidate a decision.
  • Subject Matter Bias: The Gullapalli Nageswara Rao case showed that involvement in the subject matter could create an unacceptable conflict of interest.
  • Departmental Bias: The Krishna Bus Service Pvt Ltd. v. State of Haryana case illustrated how internal conflicts within departments could compromise fairness.
  • Policy Notion Bias and Pre-Conceived Notion Bias: Cases like T. Govindaraja Mudaliar and Kondala Rao revealed that prior involvement in policy formation or preconceived opinions didn’t necessarily imply bias unless they unduly influenced the decision-making process.
  • Bias on Account of Obstinacy: The A.U. Kureshi case highlighted how obstinacy could lead to bias, particularly when the same individual is involved in multiple aspects of a decision.

These notes encapsulate the essence and application of the Rule Against Bias across various judicial scenarios, emphasizing the need for impartiality in ensuring justice.

Conclusion: The Rule Against Bias is a fundamental principle in natural justice and fair administrative proceedings. It ensures that decision-makers maintain impartiality and are free from any personal, financial, or preconceived biases that might influence their judgment. By safeguarding against various forms of bias—including personal bias, pecuniary bias, subject matter bias, policy notion bias, pre-conceived notion bias, and bias on account of obstinacy—the rule upholds the integrity and fairness of judicial and administrative processes, ensuring that justice is both served and seen to be served.

Download PDF Notes

Wait Time remaining: 50 seconds

What is Rule Against Bias?

The Rule Against Bias ensures that decision-makers and judges must remain impartial, free from personal, financial, or preconceived opinions that could influence their judgment.

How many Types of Bias?

There are 6 types of bias: Personal Bias,Pecuniary Bias,Subject Matter Bias,Policy Notion Bias,Pre-conceived Notion Bias,Bias on Account of Obstinacy

TAGGED:administrative law
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp Copy Link Print
Leave a Comment Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe Newsletter

Loading

Read Also:

Budget 2025: Full Schedule, Live Streaming Details, and How to Watch on Mobile

As Budget Day approaches, here’s a quick look at the key events…

Electoral Bonds: SC Refuses To Direct Disclosure Of Information Of 2018

The Supreme Court declined to mandate the disclosure of electoral bond information…

What is a State? Definition, Elements of State

Aristotle, who is regarded as Father of Political Science. According to him,…

You Might Also Like

Administrative Discretion Notes Hand written
Administrative Law

Administrative Discretion Notes: Meaning and Grounds of Control

By Admin
Administrative Directions: Nature, Enforceability, Need - Short Notes
Administrative Law

Administrative Directions: Nature, Enforceability, Need – Short Notes

By Admin
Ombudsman in Administrative Law – Short Notes
Administrative Law

Ombudsman in Administrative Law – Short Notes

By Admin
Tribunals and Types of Tribunals in India- Law Notes
Administrative Law

Tribunals and Types of Tribunals in India- Law Notes

By Admin
Law Monitor is an online resource for legal professionals providing comprehensive coverage of the latest news related to law. Aso notes for BaLLB and LLB Students. Its timely notifications make it easy to keep up with the ever-changing landscape of legal discourse. Law Monitor is an invaluable resource for those actively involved in legislation or legal matters.
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Youtube Instagram
Check also
  • Home
  • Web Stories
  • Image Compressor Online Tool
  • Current Affairs
  • Bare Acts Download
  • Blog
FacebookLike
InstagramFollow
TelegramFollow
More Info
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Saved / History
Join Telegram For Notes

Law Monitor © Copyright 2024, All Rights Reserved

Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc.

Loading
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.